I was overjoyed when I bought my MacBook Air last year. Ultra-low voltage CPUs had finally grown to respectable speeds and I had become tired of my old HP. In the first year of my MBA program I found it too cumbersome and too heavy to bring to class and never did. But at under 3 pounds, the Air was barely felt in my backpack and a joy to use in class. The only problem was I lost my ability to rip vinyl as the Air's have no line input.
This is a problem I have wanted to rectify for a long time now. Sadly, ADC's are not cheap. The commonly used EMU 0404 and Tascam 144 MKII are both $150, not terribly expensive but not affordable. Another unit that interested me is the HRT Linestreamer+. Michael Fremer of analogplanet.com recently used it to record samples for his cartridge shoot-out and I thought the samples sounded great. What's best, it only sports one RCA line input and a USB output; seemingly made for needledroping. Unfortunately the price on that unit is a terror-inducing $350.
After a bit more shopping around I discovered the Behringer UCA202, providing me line-in recording for a price of only $30. But is a $30 recording device really worth $30? According to NwAvGuy, maybe so: http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/behringer-uca202-review.html
I've had my new toy for a few days now, and my impressions are very positive. My Satisfaction rips were done with the UCA202, so for the purposes of this blog, comparing sound samples to better inform collectors, the UCA202 performs spectacularly. The noise floor is non-existent and it is fully compatible on Mac or Windows with the popular free recording program Audacity. Even when putting the UCA202 under a higher stress test, namely ripping vinyl and conducting listening tests comparing the rip with vinyl playback, the unit performs admirably. Recording at the unit's maximum 48k 16 bit resolution, and with the volume set as high as it will go without clipping, I had a very hard time distinguishing the needledrop from real vinyl playback. However, at 44.1k and with the volume set slightly too low, the needledrop exhibited a touch less snap in the drums and the tight rumble of the bass sounded a hair flabbier. So remember, experiment with your settings to find what works best for you and your equipment.
An annoyance that must be mentioned is that the input level of the UCA202 is fixed. This means you must have a volume control somewhere in your chain if using this ADC. A home theater receiver, integrated amp, or headphone amp will do the trick.
I would also like to reiterate that he resolution is capped at 16-bit 48-khz. I believe this resolution adequate for vinyl ripping (were not mastering a multi-track album here!), but I know of some enthusiasts who must have 24-bit 96-khz recordings.
Bottom line, this is a great ADC. I feel comfortable archiving any of my records with the UCA202. I am happy I did not unnecessarily overspend on an overqualified unit. If you want your needledropping ticket for a twelfth the price of a Linestreamer+, this is the way to go.
This is a problem I have wanted to rectify for a long time now. Sadly, ADC's are not cheap. The commonly used EMU 0404 and Tascam 144 MKII are both $150, not terribly expensive but not affordable. Another unit that interested me is the HRT Linestreamer+. Michael Fremer of analogplanet.com recently used it to record samples for his cartridge shoot-out and I thought the samples sounded great. What's best, it only sports one RCA line input and a USB output; seemingly made for needledroping. Unfortunately the price on that unit is a terror-inducing $350.
After a bit more shopping around I discovered the Behringer UCA202, providing me line-in recording for a price of only $30. But is a $30 recording device really worth $30? According to NwAvGuy, maybe so: http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/behringer-uca202-review.html
I've had my new toy for a few days now, and my impressions are very positive. My Satisfaction rips were done with the UCA202, so for the purposes of this blog, comparing sound samples to better inform collectors, the UCA202 performs spectacularly. The noise floor is non-existent and it is fully compatible on Mac or Windows with the popular free recording program Audacity. Even when putting the UCA202 under a higher stress test, namely ripping vinyl and conducting listening tests comparing the rip with vinyl playback, the unit performs admirably. Recording at the unit's maximum 48k 16 bit resolution, and with the volume set as high as it will go without clipping, I had a very hard time distinguishing the needledrop from real vinyl playback. However, at 44.1k and with the volume set slightly too low, the needledrop exhibited a touch less snap in the drums and the tight rumble of the bass sounded a hair flabbier. So remember, experiment with your settings to find what works best for you and your equipment.
An annoyance that must be mentioned is that the input level of the UCA202 is fixed. This means you must have a volume control somewhere in your chain if using this ADC. A home theater receiver, integrated amp, or headphone amp will do the trick.
I would also like to reiterate that he resolution is capped at 16-bit 48-khz. I believe this resolution adequate for vinyl ripping (were not mastering a multi-track album here!), but I know of some enthusiasts who must have 24-bit 96-khz recordings.
Bottom line, this is a great ADC. I feel comfortable archiving any of my records with the UCA202. I am happy I did not unnecessarily overspend on an overqualified unit. If you want your needledropping ticket for a twelfth the price of a Linestreamer+, this is the way to go.




.jpg)


